Sunday, December 16, 2012

Newtown and Medication


As we are all saddened by the tragedy at Newtown, I hear no concern or outcry about the fact that all of these teens/young adults that do these heinous things are medicated, generally for years, by drugs such as RItilan, Adderall, or worse.  Why is that???  I'm stumped as to why this isn't a discussion point...

These drugs alter brain chemistry, and juvenile minds are known to be in a transition state.  Any time you mess with personality, there is an opportunity for that change to be negative.

I’ve seen in my own family how readily and eager “Mental Health Professionals” are to subscribe more and higher dosages.  I’m sure in most cases the doctors are performing admirably, but I am concerned at the acceptance of society to putting more and more drugs into our bodies.

There are legitimate arguments on both sides of the gun debate, and these discussions need to occur. (I land on the side of gun control only effects law abiding citizens).   But I truly fear that the gun debate will obscure whet, in my opinon, is the root cause – medication of children.

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Obama could win - Really?

I really don't understand why a significant percentage of US Persons are still considering voting for President Obama in November.  I'll explain below...

First, I am one of the dreaded "Independents", and have a Libertarian view (socially "liberal", fiscally "conservative") and I lean to minimal government.  So in truth, the recent Democratic Party has left little interest for me.

That being said, why is Obama still competitive?    I understand why Americans of "african" descent will overwhelmingly support Obama, and similarly why Mormans will overwhelmingly support Romney.  That is simple human nature to support one's clan, and I have no issue with that.  I also know hard core Dems and Repubs will vote the Party Line, even if Hitler were at the top of the ticket.  I have issue with that, but accept it.

The question is, Why do roughly half of the 40-50% of the rest of us still support Obama?  His Presidency, by any objective measure, has been a disaster.  He has proven to have no leadership skills, no consensus building ability, and does not inspire confidence in many people.  The nation is heading in the fiscal direction of Greece, and the personal liberty direction of Russia.

Romney is a centrist, not a right wing fanatic (Ryan is the right wing dude on ticket).  Romney is a successful businessman and politician, and has a much better resume than Obama had in 2008.  He is milquetoast, but has not had any major gaffes.  He's had his issues with misstatements for sure, none terribly offensive.

I'm not terribly thrilled about Romney (would've preferred Ron Paul), but given the inability of Obama to actually perform adequately as President, the choice is obvious.  I think Clint Eastwood was right, we need to replace those that don't work out.

Friday, August 24, 2012

USADA and the Ginger Hammer


USADA and the Ginger Hammer

One thing has bothered me about the Lance Armstrong/USADA battle, and now especially with it’s conclusion.  That is the total and complete authority of the governing body, even apparently independent of the US Judicial System, and the manor in which they act.  I guess I believe that in 1999-2005 he was doping, and can even believe he wasn’t caught during all the testing he underwent..  I also definitely believe that the USADA was carrying out a vendetta, and that Lance had zero shot at a fair “trial”.  But that was not the point.  It was clear with the evident joy in the USADA announcement that the Inquisition had brought the heretic to “justice”, regardless of whether fairness was employed.

I see the same template in the NFL.  Roger Goodell swings the Ginger Hammer, and Jonathon Vilma is sacrificed on the alter of the Shield.  The US Judge, who apparently is trying to find some legal way to overturn Goodell because of the unfairness of his actions toward Vilma, has not succeeded.   As soon as the Judge admits defeat, a triumphant Goodell will claim that as validation of his actions, and Vilma will be smitten (or is it smote?).

Goodell is the same as the USADA.  Confident in their unchallengeable power over the minions in their rule, they do not have to even feign fairness, since they know they are unassailable.   This is no different than a petty dictator (Saddam anyone?) who abuses power.  Or a Chicago Mayor.  Or a Homeowners Association president.  Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely (and it rocks absolutely – thanks Dr. Kirwan).

Guilty or Innocent, neither Vilma or Armstrong stood a chance.  That should make us all fear any consolidation of power at any level…

Saturday, April 21, 2012

Hall of Fame

I tend to think that the Hall of Fame has been devalued of late.  I really only pay attention to pro football, but it seems whenever a player is very good, but not special, folks start hyping for "HOF" worthy.  In my opinion, it should be a rare event that all 5 slots are filled each year.

I am now of the age where I have some perspective of the players being elected.  ESPN basically lobbied for Michael Irvin, and it was sickening.  Brett Favre, please.  Favre was NEVER considered even one of the top two QBs playing during any year of his career!  He lost as many games with his gunslinger approach as he won.  I'll give you that he was really fun to watch, but he was never exceptional in the way that Manning, Brady, and even Rogers is now.

So what are appropriate criteria?  I would say there are two areas, excellence and impact.  To be considered for excellence, you would need to be the top player (or second) by consensus at your position for the majority of your career.  For any position - Punter to OLine  (I'm still unsure of long snapper!).

Litmus test:   Brady and Manning - no questions there.  Elway, Marino - obvious.  Emmitt, Barry Sanders, LT,  Prime Time and Charles Woodson,  Ray Lewis and LT , Reed and Palomalu.  No questions.  But McNabb?  Really?

I suggest the candidates be evaluated by position instead of by publicity.  The selectors should be forced to evaluate O-line and D-Line and Linebackers and wideouts for WHO WAS BEST, not just best known.

And Yes, Ray Guy should be in.

The other category is really "fame", or infamy.  Joe Namath was an above average QB, no more.  But the Hall would not be complete without him. Perhaps this is where Favre belongs, in this category.  But Pat Tillman does belong here.  And Lynn Swann.  Not the best, but the story needs to be told.

Just my two cents.

Ron

Trayon and Zimmerman


Trayon and Zimmerman

It is unlikely that “we” the public will ever know exactly what happened in Sanford Florida.  However, there are several facts that are known, most importantly are that a young man died and another man’s life was ruined.  This essay is meant to examine the situation and the emotions generated, hopefully from a dispassionate perspective.

Trayon Martin is typically portrayed as a fully innocent, never in trouble, kid who had never done anything wrong.  This is the impression that most still hold, and it is incorrect.  Though far from a delinquent or habitual offender, it appears that he was perhaps a shade on the wrong side of a “normal” teenage boy.  Excerpts from his record and social media history show a bit of a rough edge, and talk of being “gangsta”.  This could all be bravado, but given his age and the environment he grew up in, it is not inconceivable that he carried a bit of attitude.

George Zimmerman is typically portrayed as a “vigilante” who went to far, a “volunteer” who wished to hold police powers.  This may be backed up by the fact that he did not back off when the 911 operator asked him to.  However, his neighbors gave a different perspective.  I also find it interesting that though Mr. Zimmerman is at least half Hispanic, and visually favors that description, yet is still mostly described a “white”.  I can’t help but think that there may be an element of anti-Semitism due to his name.

I do not know if Sanford, FL has had recurring problems with vandalism or theft.  The fact that this incident occurred in a gated community and that there is an active neighborhood watch with patrols would tend to lead me to that conclusion.

The fact that “leaders” such as the Rev’s. Jackson, Sharpton, and Farrakhan have weighed in have not helped the issue and have only created more tension in an already sad situation.  I suspect they have done this for their own benefit and fame, rather than altruistic motives.  However, the volatile rhetoric they have espoused may have succeeded in getting the arrest warrant for Mr. Zimmerman and perhaps a trial, which could be good for all sides.

A criminal trial, at it’s theoretical heart, is a search for truth and answers.  The trial should bring out all the nuances of both actors in this drama.  Mr. Martin will not look so pure, and Mr. Zimmerman will not look so evil.  I suspect the end view will be closer to reality than the current caricatures.

So here is what I believe happened, from my distant perch and limited information…

Trayon was on an innocent errand and ran across Zimmerman, who mistook Trayon for an interloper in the neighborhood.   Wearing a “hoodie”, and perhaps sporting a rebellious nature, Trayon probably did not react in a respectful and courteous tone that the neighborhood watch “officer” deemed was required, and fit the profile of someone out for trouble.  If Zimmerman tried to stop Trayon from continuing on, or if Trayon got up in Zimmermans face, we may never know.  But somehow a scuffle ensued, and when Trayon got the better of it, Zimmerman felt endangered, scared, panicked, and fired the weapon.  It was unfortunately accurate.

I don’t know if Zimmerman is or is not guilty of any crime.  But I do know that a fair trial could go a long way to understanding the situation.  If Zimmerman is found “not guilty” in a trial (either fair or unfair), I fear for the resulting civil unrest.  That is why I also fear that he will be unable to get a fair trial as authorities fear the potential result.